Is the UN Abolishing the U.S. Constitution?



Comments (24)

  1. James Maxwell says:

    Considering what is current running our nation in Washington DC I would not be surprised if the Occupier didn’t bow down and kiss their collective
    backsides. But as for me, I am an American, my ancestors kicked the British out of our lives and we have stood in the breech against all enemies, both
    foreign and domestic. We will not lie down and let
    any corrupt, dysfunctional collection of despots and criminals dictate to us on how to deal with the criminal invasion of our nation by foreign nationals, regardless of who or what they are. You come here
    illegally to invade our nation, kill our citizens, steal from us, or corrupt our political system and you will be sent home quicker than you can blink. We can be your best friend, but when crossed we will make you rue the day you were born.

    [Reply]

    eddie Reply:

    James – you have a lot to learn… and unlearn my friend. Things are not what they seem. You have been fooled on a few issues…

    [Reply]

    Robert Reply:

    As quoted in the article: “The special freedoms we enjoy under the U.S. Constitution could soon be distant memories. When international law trumps American law, we all have a problem.”

    What are the special freedoms that we enjoy since we are serfs of an illegal federal government, a de facto government as a matter of fact?

    [Reply]

  2. Don says:

    Here is a very simple solution about the ILLEGALS coming to the US;
    1. round them all up
    2. have the dim-wit UN ship them to their own countries
    3. Problem solved America pays $0.00

    [Reply]

  3. Donald Moore says:

    We, the people of the United States, need to speak with one voice to our elected officials, too keep what our forefather have started, fought for, and died for: “FREEDOM”. One voice,” stick the U.N. laws where the sun does not shine.”

    [Reply]

  4. Jim says:

    How about kicking the UN out of New York for starters?

    [Reply]

  5. James Wilson says:

    The UN in not a democratic institution, and does not have the right to impose ANY RESTRICTIONS on any nation for any action.
    A prime example are the restrictions that it attempts to impose on Israel for defending itself from attack by terrorists.

    These people are obsessed with their self importance and are selective in their criticisms of various countries based on religion and race. Minor (supposedly non-aligned) countries are put in positions of power and are heavily influenced by major players. There is no action against Russia for not returning captured Japanese after the war, and what action against China for invading and annexing Tibet. Russia’s recent actions against the Ukraine have not gotten comments. This proxy war fought by rebels and “Russian volunteers” is an obvious interference in a free nations rights, according to the UN rules, but the UN is very silent. It is time to move the UN to a non aligned country like Switzerland or Brazil to ensure that they are not being unduly influenced by the US.

    [Reply]

    Glenn Sellers Reply:

    By the US or against the US? In case you haven’t noticed, over the last few years, almost anything the US wants done, the UN has, in effect, vetoed. Personally, I’m all for the US pulling out of the UN and telling them to take a long hike on a short pier over shark infested waters. In the beginning, the UN was a good idea, but NOW? Not so good. But, that’s my humble opinion.

    [Reply]

    eddie Reply:

    The US was set up to be the engine room to lead the world to where we are today – on the doorstep to City of London Corporation international bankers, long awaited, New World Order. Check out their “Georgia Guide Stones” in Elberton. The UN is not only part of this – it is meant to be their NWO world government. The US has been at war now for over 70 years… think about it…

    [Reply]

    Daidalos Reply:

    No the United States was not established for that reason. The United States was created not by some international bank/bankers but by men who believed that they had suffered abuse of the natural rights of men, by King George and the English Parliament. In fact had King George and the English Parliament granted the colonies the right to have a say in Parliament, the U.S. would still probably be part of the English commonwealth. Google it, that’s a FACT. Second, “Open borders” is a natural progression towards a later point in human civilization. (Ie; man discovered agriculture, this led to longer overall median lives, this led to familial groups forming together into tribes and that led to this….and so on down the line to where we are today. You can Google that as well, it’s a FACT.

  6. Brad Huntley says:

    Why not deport the hordes of illegals in this country to the UN countries that want our borders to be open. Then we will see if they still sing the same song.

    [Reply]

    MarkOwen Reply:

    Agreed! And do it just like the Obama Admin is doing to us. Send them uninvited to all the countries who are making the most noise. Unload the planes and fly them back home to pick up more.

    [Reply]

  7. Brenda says:

    The only viable solution to the UN incursion is a very definitive response. The UN does not dictate to America or any other souverign country their policies or their laws. They, the UN, was created to be a migator between waring countries and they need to be either scaled back to that purpose or dissolved.

    [Reply]

  8. Will says:

    Obama and his cohorts came into office with the intention of doing everything to make the United States a part of the world order and abolish our Constitution… This is nothing new…

    [Reply]

  9. Mary Jane Simmons says:

    The House of Representatives should stop all funds to the UN and we the people need to throw these criminals out of our country…NOW.

    [Reply]

  10. larry says:

    All these people crossing the border constitutes an invasion, perhaps we should declare war on these countries and and consider anyone crossing the border invading combatants who should be shot. After the Rio runs red for a couple days the invasion would stop.

    [Reply]

  11. Glenn Schott says:

    After WW-2 the Untied States played peace makers and rebuilt Japan’s industry to the point that the steel mills in Japan out-shined our own. This caused our corporation to buy much of their steel overseas rather than from our own country. Now we are so “politically correct” that we cannot even defend our sovereign rights or our boarders without being called racist or intolerant of other, less prosperous peoples.
    How do they think we became so prosperous in the past and why we are suffering now? It is because we governed ourselves and were prepared to defend ourselves and our decisions, regardless of what the world thought of us.
    It is time for political correctness to go away and once again time for the truth to reign, regardless of hurt feelings.

    [Reply]

  12. JJ Morris says:

    We should not budge either. We should send these children home. The UN is not our Country…we, the American people, are our Country for over 200 years. Quit trying to change it, take it away, or any other ideas you people try and come up with.

    [Reply]

  13. James Eddens says:

    Although I feel sorry for these kids, there is another solution to this problem and it is for the whole the world to help with this crisis, not just the US. This is an international problem, and not ours alone. The whole world seems to be waiting to see what we will do, instead of trying to help with the problem. I feel so sorry for the children but the U.N must be good for something beside talking.
    Why are the west trying to solve the problems of the middle east? Why can’t they solve their own problems? We should not be trying to buy friends.

    [Reply]

    Glen Reply:

    Have you SEEN these (so called) “children?” They are TEENAGERS who are involved in GANGS and have NO respect for us Americans. It’s not like they’re poor INFANTS wrapped in a blanket, they are young PUNKS, THUMBING THEIR NOSES AT US AS THEY CROSS OUR SOUTHERN BORDER with the promise of FREE EVERYTHING, JUST VOTE DEMOCRAT! The MEDIA dress it all up to make it sound like their precious little babies, strapped to the tops of a rolling train, but they are FAR from that. I’ve SEEN the pictures of them. The border is Pandora’s Box and MUST NOT BE OPENED! We will ONLY regret it if we do and it WON’T be reversible. SLAM THAT GATE SHUT AND WELD IT TIGHT! SHIP ANY POLITICIAN SOUTH IF HE CRIES OUT IN THEIR DEFENSE! They wanna cry out for innocent babies? They can start by crying out for ABORTED babies and ORPHANS HERE! We’ve GOT plenty of them as it is. :-/

    [Reply]

  14. sparks galore says:

    Been around for quite a few years, and have not seen much good come from the U.N.. It probably has a few redeeming qualities, but I’m still trying to think of one now. It has hamstrung the U.S. and several other nations that strive for freedom and autonomy from the start. It has pitted free and prosperous countries against socialist and dictatorial states since it’s inception. When Russia, and China, and Iran, just to name a few can tell us how we can run our country, something is not up to par. For those who think socialism will make equal prosperity for all, just at the socialist countries and tell me where the equality is.
    As for our border policy, those who argue for open, uncontrolled borders and immigration policy, I think you should come to West Texas where I live, and see what it is doing to our way of living. They flock to our country to escape the living conditions and governmental graft, as well as the drug cartels. But they want to turn this country into what they have fled from. If it were possible to transplant my home town as well as many other small towns from this area, and set it down right smack in the middle of Juarez, Mexico, you were scarcely notice the difference. They want all the benefits, but not the burden of maintaining it. If the laws concerning employing illegals was enforced, and the jobs were not there, and the welfare disappeared, so would most of them.
    Last but not least, drop the U.S. monetary contribution to the U.N., to be on par with every other nation, and it will cease to function.

    [Reply]

  15. Mark says:

    It is a constitutional matter that citizens have a protected border. The liar we have in the whitehouse is arrogant enough to think he is above the law and the constitution. I hope the governor of Texas will ask citizens to donate to keep the national guard on the border. Hopefully the citizens of this country will chip in and pay for not only Texas’ border but New Mexico and Arizona.The feds will not pay even though it is their duty to keep the borders secure.It will be up to the citizens. It is probably tax deductible.

    [Reply]

  16. Black Eagle says:

    When UN law trumps US law, keep your eyes on Rednecks, they will initiate the shot that will be heard around the world.

    [Reply]

  17. Black Eagle says:

    The border issue if addressed by the world court, will contain elements of the treaty Mexico president signed (with a literal gun held to his head) ceding the north half of Mexico for which a clause allowing the migration of native peoples EG 50% or more native blood- most mexicans average 65% native DNA.

    [Reply]

Add Comment