10 Signs We’re Not in Another Real Estate Bubble (Part 1)

Over at Yahoo! Finance, the headline for one of the most popular articles screams, “Housing Already Shows Signs of a New Bubble.”

The exact same sentiment is being shouted from the rooftops at Forbes, too: “Home Builders Could Become Heartbreakers Again.”

We’re less than one year into a legitimate recovery in prices, and already the pundits can’t help but sound the alarm about another possible “bubble”? Give me a break!

Forget Rodney Dangerfield, the residential real estate rebound gets “no respect.”

Don’t worry. We’re nowhere close to another peak. Nor has the profit potential for housing-related investments suddenly vanished.

Here are 10 hard facts to prove it…

1. Too Far, Too Fast? Nope!

Housing market bears point to the meteoric rise of homebuilding stocks as proof that the recovery has been too robust, too soon.

The S&P 1500 Homebuilder group is up 170% since hitting a low in August 2011. In the last year alone, many individual homebuilder stocks, like KB Home (KBH), PulteGroup Inc. (PHM) and Ryland Group (RYL), doubled in price.

As Bespoke Investment Group aptly points out, though, “Remember that ‘too far, too fast’ is relative.” And, in this case, short-term relativity can be deceiving.

It turns out that the S&P 1500 Homebuilder group is still down 55% from its 2005 high, despite the impressive run-up over the last 18 months. Too far, too fast? I don’t think so!

2. Peak Activity? Nope!

Actual homebuilding and sales activity haven’t peaked, either.

Based on the January data, single-family housing starts remain roughly 65% below the peak hit during the last boom. And they’re about 40% below the long-term average since 1962. As far as existing home sales, we’re still about 30% below peak levels.

3. RFI is Back in the Black.

Ever since 2005, the real estate market has been a drag on the U.S. economy. More specifically, residential fixed investment (RFI) weakened GDP growth.

Not anymore! In the fourth quarter, RFI added 0.4% to GDP growth.

In dollar terms, RFI needs to increase another 40% just to hit the long-term average since 1995. So forget being near a top. The latest data indicates that “the housing rebound is fairly entrenched at this point,” as RBS Securities’ economist, Omair Sharif, puts it.

Entrenched… with plenty of room to run, too.

4. Less Distressed.

Any talk about the housing market wouldn’t be complete without mentioning the unending onslaught of foreclosures and short sales, which naturally hold back a recovery – particularly in prices. But (surprise, surprise) “distressed sales” are becoming less and less of a factor.

Notices of defaults, scheduled auctions, bank repossessions and other filings fell 28% in the last year, according to RealtyTrac. Perhaps even more telling is the fact that new foreclosure filings are at their lowest levels since June 2006.

As RealtyTrac’s Daren Blomquist says, “We’re now well past the peak of the foreclosure crisis.” I’ll say!

In all fairness, foreclosure filings are still running hot – at about twice the pace experienced in 2005. But we can’t overlook the progress being made. In many hard-hit markets, foreclosure sales now account for a dramatically smaller portion of the market (see table below).

Take Las Vegas, for instance. In January 2012, foreclosures accounted for a staggering 45.5% of sales. Fast forward to today, though, and that figure has been more than cut in half, to 12.5%, according to calculations by economist, Thomas Lawler.

If we look at the short sale data, a similar trend is developing, too.

Add it all up, and as Bill McBride of Calculatedriskblog.com says, “In every area that reports distressed sales, the share of distressed sales is down year-over-year – and down significantly in most areas.”

That means conventional sales are picking up, which is “a major continued improvement for the market,” according to Trulia.com’s Chief Economist, Jed Kolko. I agree.

And once again, the data points to a market on the mend, not in bubble territory.

5. No More Negative Equity for You!

Aside from short sales and foreclosures, the other main factor holding back the real estate market has been the number of homeowners sidelined because of negative equity. But that’s becoming less and less of an issue, too.

Thanks to rising prices, nearly two million homeowners were freed from negative equity over the last year, according to a report from Zillow.

Of course, the number of homeowners underwater remains high, at about 13.8 million. But that just means the real estate recovery has much more room for progress.

That’s it for today. In tomorrow’s column, I’ll share five more signs – backed up by hard data – that the real estate recovery is here to stay. I’ll also share a handful of ways to profit from the continued boom. So stay tuned.

Ahead of the tape,

Louis Basenese

Related Topics: Economy and Politics, Market Analysis, Myth Busting, Real Estate, Think Contrarian, U.S.



Comments (4)

  1. Roy says:

    “… housing starts remain almost 200% below the peak hit during the last boom. And they’re more than 60% below the long-term average since 1962. As far as existing home sales, we’re still about 40% below peak levels.”
    Be Consistent and clear about the way you calculate and express relationships between numbers. If housing starts were 200% below the peak they would be negative, and counts can’t be negative. The peak might have been 200% higher than current levels, but that would mean that current levels are 67% lower than the peak (current/peak = 0.33). Always calculate the relationship in the same way as you express it (and vise versa) or the numbers you present could be just plain wrong. Your mistake on the housing starts comparison makes me doubt all of the other comparisons you quote. Are housing starts < 0.4 x the average (as you state) or is the average more than 1.6 x current housing starts (based on your similar misstatement of the comparison to the peak). Your words refer to a specific mathematical formula. That formula must exactly match the formula used to generate the number presented or the entire communication will be wrong.

    [Reply]

    Louis Basenese Reply:

    Totally my error. I had the formulas in excel pointing to the wrong cells. I’ve updated the figures to make it clearer. Thanks for catching the error and more importantly, letting me know!

    Best,

    Lou

    [Reply]

  2. Dave says:

    The extreme shortage of inventory in our area is putting lots of pressure on prices to rise. Locally prices are up 16% over last year. If the trend continues and at that high rate, a bubble we will have. No doubt Lou.

    [Reply]

  3. Dr D says:

    There are at least 2 important points than seemed to be overlooked.
    1) As in the last RE bubble, income rise was no where near the rise of RE prices, so riskier & riskier loan products were needed to maintain escalating prices. Incomes are now lower, less people with incomes
    2)Demographics, the peak of baby boom spending hit about 2007, as the crash was setting up. We are now heading down hill, demographically speaking. The echo boomers are smaller in #’s, many have college debt, are probably years away.

    [Reply]

Comments

At A Glance

Recent Articles

Most Popular

Search

Hide me
Show me