Zipcar, Inc.: Steer Clear of the “Winner’s Curse” (Part 2)
If I asked you to invest in my business that’s lost money for a decade and might never turn a profit, would you be interested?
I didn’t think so.
So why in the world are investors clamoring to get a piece of car-sharing company, Zipcar, Inc. (Nasdaq: ZIP)?
The stock has blasted a staggering 56% higher since its initial public offering (IPO) on April 14. And yet, if you take the time to read the company’s IPO prospectus, you immediately get smacked in the face with this tidbit:
“We have experienced net losses in each year since our inception [in 2000]. We do not know if our business operations will become profitable.”
As I warned yesterday, the only explanation is that investors are buying into the hype, not the actual fundamentals. Because when you look under the hood, it’s clear that Zipcar is nothing more than a lemon.
Losses, Losses… and More Losses
If you’re unfamiliar with Zipcar’s business model, it provides the “freedom of wheels when you want them.” Its 560,000 members, called “Zipsters,” can rent the cars by the hour or day, with both gas and insurance included. And the company boasts a fleet of over 8,000 Zipcars, spread across major metropolitan areas and college campuses.
In short, Zipcar is really just a rental car company with a clever PR campaign.
And apparently, that’s all it takes to dupe investors into buying shares. Please don’t be similarly misled.
This is anything but a growth stock. The truth is, Zipcar has spent a decade trying to turn a profit – with no success. And upon closer examination, it appears the business is actually going in reverse.
Yes, sales rose by an impressive 41.8% over the past year. However, expenses jumped by 40.2%. And losses more than tripled to $14.5 million.
In other words, management is spending way more money than the company is taking in. That might work for the U.S. government for prolonged periods of time, but Wall Street seldom tolerates it.
What’s more troubling is the fact that the outlook for the company is similarly bleak. More losses lie ahead.
Five Reasons Why Zipcar Will Struggle to Turn a Profit
Here are five reasons why Zipcar faces an uphill battle:
1. Limited Market Opportunity:
Zipcar estimates that there are currently 10 million potential customers within a short walk of a Zipcar. Yet management has only been able to penetrate 5% to 10% of that market. So even if the company expands from its current list of 14 metropolitan areas to the 100 potential markets that it’s identified, the amount of potential customers remains limited.
2. No Scalability:
Zipcar’s prospectus doesn’t hesitate to brag about its “proprietary and scalable technology platform.” But the software isn’t the main driver of the business like it is for a company like OpenTable (Nasdaq: OPEN). Adding new members doesn’t mean just adding a new user to a software program. It means more cars, more parking spaces, more insurance and more gas. The company even acknowledges this itself…
3. Capital Intensive and Low Margin:
As Zipcar expands into new markets, it needs to “make significant investments in vehicles and parking.” Even after the company absorbs the “significant upfront fixed costs,” there’s no guarantee that enough demand will exist to recoup the investment.
Not to mention, the business is notoriously low margin. Net margins check in at less than 10% for rental car companies. And soaring gas prices promise to squeeze those margins even more.
You don’t need a doctorate to figure out that a business requiring massive expenditures to make minimal profits isn’t an attractive business. And it’s certainly not a business that warrants a premium valuation.
4. Not a True Cost Saver:
Zipcar bills its services as “a cost-saving alternative to car ownership.” But it’s not exactly cheap. Five to six days of rentals per month can run up to $400. And one-day rates, although all-inclusive, can end up being more expensive than a traditional car rental. It might be easy to sell customers on convenience, but cost ultimately determines how long customers stick around.
5. Serious Threat of New Entrants:
Zipcar’s first-mover advantage promises to be short-lived. Think about it. Zipcar might have a fleet of 8,000 cars, but traditional rental car companies have fleets in the hundreds of thousands. They also boast a much better infrastructure. All they have to do is flip a few switches and they can compete directly with Zipcar.
Indeed, Hertz Global Holdings (NYSE: HTZ) is already jumping into the fray with its “Connect” car-sharing program. When the competition really heats up, expect price wars to follow, which promises to put more downward pressure on Zipcar’s margins.
Growth is Never Worth This Much
In the end, even if Zipcar boasted strong profit growth, its valuation is completely out of touch with reality. It’s a classic example of the winner’s curse that I mentioned yesterday – investors bidding more for an item than it’s worth.
Here’s the kicker: At current prices, Zipcar carries a market capitalization of $1.1 billion. Yet the entire car-sharing market was only worth $253 million in 2009, according to Frost & Sullivan.
That means Zipcar shares are currently trading at roughly four times the current value of the total car-sharing market and at about one-third of the expected market value by 2020.
Even if Zipcar controlled 100% of the market (which it doesn’t), that’s too steep a price to pay.
Bottom line: Since share prices ultimately follow earnings – and Zipcar has none – it shouldn’t be long before shares hit the skids. So don’t be fooled by the initial rally. Like all overhyped IPOs, it promises to be short-lived and followed by hefty losses.
Ahead of the tape,
Louis Basenese
Related Topics: Small Cap, Stocks, Think Contrarian









I don’t know Mr. Basenese but I sure know why I started Zipcar in 1999. I am amused to hear the same arguments that we had to listen to almost 12 years ago, repeated by him. Back then most people used those arguments to “predict” our demise and prophesied the failure of the company within months. Yet, here we are, 11 years after incorporating, with hundreds of thousands of people using the service and loving it. Maybe investors today understand again that infrastructure and a strong brand can provide security in the long run. Maybe they are not buying into a “hype” but into a new paradigm, which Mr. Bacanese clearly doesn’t understand if he calls Zipcar “just another rental car company”.
[Reply]
john henry Reply:
May 1st, 2011 at 12:55 pm
Mr Danielson, if it is so good, why can’t you make money..guesses public’s money enrich you only.
[Reply]
Louis Basenese Reply:
May 1st, 2011 at 8:45 pm
Thank you for taking the time to respond Dr. Danielson. Although our opinions vary greatly, the good news is Zipcar is now publicly traded. So the market can be the final arbiter of our disagreement… and “fair value” for the company.
If you’d care to offer a counterargument to my columns, please contact me. I’d be glad to formally share your analysis of Zipcar with our readers.
[Reply]
Sorry Dr. Danielson,
after you being involved with Zipcar since 1999 I would guess you have evolved a tunnel view and don’t want to see some basics.
Personally I don’t believe you need to know the specifics because the generals rules of business are valid for pretty much all kinds of business. Very simplified: How much money comes in, how much money goes out.
At Apr. 28, your company published to outfit 20 New York City Vehicles with Yakima Bike Racks and Empire Passport Permits for Complimentary Access to New York State Parks. To me that means more money going out.
Your business models says, insurance and gas included. Gas prises are rising strongly, insurances will follow. Both means money going out.
I see car manufacturers entering your market (If you don’t see it in the USA, have a look to Germany, e.g. Daimler and BMW, the US will follow). Your costs of buying a car will be higher than the costs of some of your (future) competitors.
The costs of buying and operating a car with new technology (e.g. Hybrids) will be higher. That will be a future demand.
Your slogan “Pedal to the metal – savings through the roof” are a contradiction in itself. If you drive that way your gas consumption – and costs – will increase drastically. Just a hint. More money going out of Zipcar’s (and the shareholder’s) pocket.
Also I see another, more general topic because of the attitude of the people. What they don’t own they don’t honor. They simply don’t care. Which means your costs of cleaning and repairing the cars will be higher than by a privately owned car.
I have this issue each time I rent a car. They are sometimes disgustingly dirty and in bad technical condition. If you want to keep your customers, it means higher operating costs.
I hope your business idea will survive. But under these conditions I don’t see my money in your business model.
Good Luck
[Reply]